Friday, November 12, 2010

Why Does My Thermostat Make

, THE IMPORTANCE OF A GREAT LOST



On Saturday November 6, Lyndon LaRouche gave a video conference from the U.S. of more than 3 hours, where they selected a question about UNASUR I sent, what which is an honor and I thank Lyn replied widely showing his knowledge of the region and its importance, share and upload the video explaining what is the connection problem in Central America / Colombia, "the Darien Gap" in British hands .. .




LaRouche Answers to Argentina ...

From Argentina:

Dear Lyn: A big hug from Argentina, and is well known the word for these grasslands and that they were distracted remember. I am an activist of the Youth of the Frente Grande, part of the coalition government of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, in these days very saddened by the departure of a great leader, a great man. Our dear departed Nestor, most left their seeds are grown and flourish, spreading militant popular national seed, the question is:

After his death leaves vacant a very important strategic area for us that is the Secretary General of UNASUR [Union of South American Nations]. It is mentioned as a successor to Lula, what is your opinion? especially the importance of the Darien Gap, which prevents us from securing the work of unifying communications high-speed rail in America.

LAROUCHE: Well, I think the practicality is sometimes an indirect way of addressing a problem like this.

The problem here is America. If we had a decent lead here in America, we would immediately coincide with NAWAPA. The Darien Gap plan is an extension, in essence, the idea of \u200b\u200bNAWAPA. Build systems that are implicitly global systems that can provide the infrastructure for nations through cooperation, develop a higher level, per capita and per square kilometer.

know for example that in Argentina, for studies that did for many years, Argentina's potential in terms of population, in area, is much, much larger than we had realized to date. Because there are whole areas of Argentina that remain essentially underdeveloped, and very underdeveloped and represent a major potential wealth in the region.

There is also a story in Argentina, within the population of Argentina, of skills. And therefore, the population has an inherent cultural potential gains in production. This was true in the early postwar period is expressed very clearly Peron, and so forth. That may come back.

Taking the case of Mexico, which has been almost destroyed practically since 1982, as sben, the destruction of Mexico, ordered by the British and supported by people in the United States. And Mexico not like nowhere near what it was then. They have destroyed the people, people, culture has been destroyed. The drug has been possible because of this cultural destruction carried out by international financial interests controlled by the British.




Colombia is a nation with considerable potential. Venezuela has never had a similar development. Brazil has the potential but also has an internal social crisis among the very poor and who are, say, more powerful and have more influence. There are problems. Peru has been crushed by what he tried to do before. All these things are happening. Therefore, we need, and I believe only a change in the United States would facilitate this as something that can be programmed, which is programmable. If we had the right kind of government in America, and I have in mind a former president who is still able to do so from the United States could organize the kind of cooperation in the hemisphere that would allow the potential of these various countries perform, and release so they can perform.

There is a cultural potential in Argentina with which I am familiar. It's a good thing, but it needs an international context a context of trade and others to realize that potential. And I think a Roosevelt-style guidance on the hemisphere is the obvious answer. If one takes into account the Darien Gap project we have proposed, this would open it. There are other things there that could open it. Simply, if the United States playing the role of what Roosevelt called "good neighbor", such as the Rio Treaty, the Rio Treaty in its time.

So what we have to look therefore, above all, cooperation is the intellectual, political and among these nations intend to summarize what your potential. We need a system in the hemisphere, that sort of thing by we have always fought, some of us, that would give us the means to do so. Now mins, there are no means to do so, but we could easily create the means to achieve it. And I think the first is that the intention to go ahead, if our purpose among the people in these nations to move in that direction, establishing that purpose as an agreement of intent, we can create the basis for the result really. The first is to invent the idea and then develop the way they should create and implement that idea. I think we should be optimistic in this regard. I hope, we hope that our work now allows us to be in closer contact with the nations of South America, and that simple contact and cooperation and work together, provide the foundation to achieve what we need to accomplish.

Thanks Lyn, I would not forget in his lifetime, how important is your awareness of answering, as the letter I sent to my great-grandfather Juan Peron Trucchi ...

Source:

http://spanish.larouchepac.com/news/2010/11/08/respuestas-de-larouche-argentina-ym-xico-en-la-videoconfere.html

0 comments:

Post a Comment